-
J. Bruce Fields authored
This reverts commit a8585763. We're still factoring ctime into our change attribute even in the IS_I_VERSION case. If someone sets the system time backwards, a client could see the change attribute go backwards. Maybe we can just say "well, don't do that", but there's some question whether that's good enough, or whether we need a better guarantee. Also, the client still isn't actually using the attribute. While we're still figuring this out, let's just stop returning this attribute. Signed-off-by:
J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
1631087bJ. Bruce Fields authoredThis reverts commit a8585763. We're still factoring ctime into our change attribute even in the IS_I_VERSION case. If someone sets the system time backwards, a client could see the change attribute go backwards. Maybe we can just say "well, don't do that", but there's some question whether that's good enough, or whether we need a better guarantee. Also, the client still isn't actually using the attribute. While we're still figuring this out, let's just stop returning this attribute. Signed-off-by:
Loading