Skip to content
  • Dave Chinner's avatar
    39d3c0b5
    xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check · 39d3c0b5
    Dave Chinner authored
    
    
    We call xfs_dir_ino_validate() for every dir entry in a directory
    when doing validity checking of the directory. It calls
    xfs_verify_dir_ino() then emits a corruption report if bad or does
    error injection if good. It is extremely costly:
    
      43.27%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int
      10.28%  [kernel]  [k] __xfs_dir3_data_check
       6.61%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_verify_dir_ino
       4.16%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_errortag_test
       4.00%  [kernel]  [k] memcpy
       3.48%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir_ino_validate
    
    7% of the cpu usage in this directory traversal workload is
    xfs_dir_ino_validate() doing absolutely nothing.
    
    We don't need error injection to simulate a bad inode numbers in the
    directory structure because we can do that by fuzzing the structure
    on disk.
    
    And we don't need a corruption report, because the
    __xfs_dir3_data_check() will emit one if the inode number is bad.
    
    So just call xfs_verify_dir_ino() directly here, and get rid of all
    this unnecessary overhead:
    
      40.30%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int
      10.98%  [kernel]  [k] __xfs_dir3_data_check
       8.10%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_verify_dir_ino
       4.42%  [kernel]  [k] memcpy
       2.22%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir2_data_get_ftype
       1.52%  [kernel]  [k] do_raw_spin_lock
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    39d3c0b5
    xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check
    Dave Chinner authored
    
    
    We call xfs_dir_ino_validate() for every dir entry in a directory
    when doing validity checking of the directory. It calls
    xfs_verify_dir_ino() then emits a corruption report if bad or does
    error injection if good. It is extremely costly:
    
      43.27%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int
      10.28%  [kernel]  [k] __xfs_dir3_data_check
       6.61%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_verify_dir_ino
       4.16%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_errortag_test
       4.00%  [kernel]  [k] memcpy
       3.48%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir_ino_validate
    
    7% of the cpu usage in this directory traversal workload is
    xfs_dir_ino_validate() doing absolutely nothing.
    
    We don't need error injection to simulate a bad inode numbers in the
    directory structure because we can do that by fuzzing the structure
    on disk.
    
    And we don't need a corruption report, because the
    __xfs_dir3_data_check() will emit one if the inode number is bad.
    
    So just call xfs_verify_dir_ino() directly here, and get rid of all
    this unnecessary overhead:
    
      40.30%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int
      10.98%  [kernel]  [k] __xfs_dir3_data_check
       8.10%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_verify_dir_ino
       4.42%  [kernel]  [k] memcpy
       2.22%  [kernel]  [k] xfs_dir2_data_get_ftype
       1.52%  [kernel]  [k] do_raw_spin_lock
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Loading