-
Stephen Boyd authored
Let's rename this struct member to 'parent' to better reflect the reality that it's the parent device of this psuedo-device. In the next patch we'll put a 'struct device' inside of this struct so moving this away simplifies that patch by reducing the number of places that 'dev' is modified. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210520002519.3538432-3-swboyd@chromium.org Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Stephen Boyd authoredLet's rename this struct member to 'parent' to better reflect the reality that it's the parent device of this psuedo-device. In the next patch we'll put a 'struct device' inside of this struct so moving this away simplifies that patch by reducing the number of places that 'dev' is modified. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210520002519.3538432-3-swboyd@chromium.org Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Loading