-
Benjamin Li authored
Some nodes are incorrectly marked as RPM-controlled (they have RPM master and slave ids assigned), but are actually controlled by the application CPU instead. The RPM complains when we send requests for resources that it can't control. Let's fix this by replacing the IDs, with the default "-1" in which case no requests are sent. See commit c497f932 ("interconnect: qcom: msm8916: Remove rpm-ids from non-RPM nodes") where this was done for msm8916. Signed-off-by:
Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> Reviewed-by:
Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205015205.22947-3-benl@squareup.com Signed-off-by:
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
7c911f9dBenjamin Li authoredSome nodes are incorrectly marked as RPM-controlled (they have RPM master and slave ids assigned), but are actually controlled by the application CPU instead. The RPM complains when we send requests for resources that it can't control. Let's fix this by replacing the IDs, with the default "-1" in which case no requests are sent. See commit c497f932 ("interconnect: qcom: msm8916: Remove rpm-ids from non-RPM nodes") where this was done for msm8916. Signed-off-by:
Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> Reviewed-by:
Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205015205.22947-3-benl@squareup.com Signed-off-by:
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Loading